Fury is a tale of
two halves. The first is a distressingly uncompromising, complex look at conflict.
The second is an entertaining but empty Hollywood war flick.
Action man Brad Pitt is tank ace staff
sergeant Don ‘Wardaddy’ Collier, a grizzled veteran of the fighting in North
Africa and Europe. In the first scene we see him brutally ambush a German
soldier on horseback, stabbing him in the face or something equally distasteful.
Then we see him tenderly pet the white horse, sending it on its way with
affection. (Hitler was of course fond of animals but less keen on humans. I don’t
know why maniacal nutters are often that way.) He commands the tank ‘Fury’,
which has survived for so long partly due to Collier’s commanding skill and
partly due to luck. He has thus far managed to uphold his promise to keep his
crew safe.
The crew consists of chubby Mexican ‘Gordo’
(Michael Pena), hefty hillbilly ‘Coon-Ass’ (Jon Bernthal) and religious zealot ‘Bible’
(Shia LeBeouf). They’re equally jaded, oscillating between pious disgust at war
and blood lust. When their gunner is killed (‘the best goddamn gunner in the Second
Division’ or something like that), rooky army typist Norman (Logan Lerman) is
sent as a replacement. As is imaginable, the battle-hardened crew give him a
hard time, and Norman finds its difficult to shoot down Hitler Youth
conscripts.
The environment that Fury creates is impressive. There is
dirt everywhere – clothes, skin, ground, vehicles... they all have a pervasive
mud and grime clinging to them. The soundtrack helps with the immersive
feeling, not as in music but as in the sounds of war. There is an almost
constant barrage of rumblings, gunfire, explosions and belching tank noise. In
the tank itself we hear incessant clinking of metal, the tracks beneath whirring
and the shells whizzing overhead. The screams and shouts of the crew just about
cut through the ceaseless soundtrack of destruction: as a viewer, the feeling
is one of submersion in total war, as much as that is possible in the safety of
a cinema. The interior tank shots are plentiful enough to convey the
claustrophobia and danger of tank warfare. If one of the objectives of Fury is to transport us into this type
of enclosed, metallic combat, then Pitt and co. have succeeded magnificently.
The other thing that Fury does so well is to portray the
complexities of war. Collier is not a righteous man: he shoots a prisoner of
war where Tom Hanks’ officer protected one from mob justice in Saving Private Ryan. At yet at the same
time he is fighting Nazism. At the heart of Fury
is the examination of reality versus morality, ethics thought up in safety
conflicting with the actuality of having to implement those ethics on the
battlefield. What price is worth paying? To what degree can idealists keep
their dignity and sense of right in the muddle of war? Fury’s war is not one of glory of righteousness, but child
soldiers, murder and ceaseless slaughter. One particularly uncomfortable scene
shows the horrors of wartime rape, with the audience having to see a
post-battle town through the eyes of two terrified young women.
Filming and soundtrack aside, Fury brings war to life well by
colouring its soldiers through superb acting. Pitt manages to portray the
classic American army hero without resorting the simplicity: the nihilistic,
brutalised soldier has clearly lost his soul somewhere back on the road.
LeBeouf is often in the news for being a prat, but no one can deny his
abilities. Bernthal really made me hate Coon-Ass in all his muscular chauvinism.
Unfortunately, the filmmakers decided
that a spectacular final showdown was in order. When Fury is hit by a mine at
an important crossroads, static and without working radio, the plucky Yanks
find themselves in the path of an oncoming SS battalion. It’s always an SS
battalion, as if an average army outfit would be too easy to defeat, and not nearly
evil enough. Their last stand is hopelessly unrealistic, predictable down to the
finest detail. The German soldiers are not skilled killers, masters of war who
have honed their fighting abilities on the Eastern Front. Rather, they are clueless
buffoons, running about with no sense of tactics. Only after dozens of them are
killed does the camp, cowardly officer decide to abandon his policy of getting
his men to charge straight at the armoured vehicle and instead crack out the
anti-tank weapons. They are all hopeless shots, especially compared to the ace
gunner Norman, who is now a skilful warrior, having been fighting for about two
days. Hollywood often seems to forget that the Wehrmacht was an immense
fighting machine, and unfortunately it took more than a few Brad Pitts to
defeat it.
So Fury
is doubtless highly gripping from start to finish, over two hours later. But
the intelligent look at war in its muddled brutality, morality versus reality
and man’s violent, nihilistic abilities is all in the first half; the second
lets it down.
No comments:
Post a Comment